 |
| > |
Update: Nov. 24, 2008 |
| > |
Update: Nov. 7, 2008 |
| > |
Update: Oct. 29, 2008 |
| > |
Update: Oct. 16, 2008 |
| > |
Update: Oct. 2, 2008 |
| > |
Update: Sep. 23, 2008 |
| > |
Update: Sep. 9, 2008 |
| > |
Update: Aug. 21, 2008 |
| > |
Update: Aug. 8, 2008 |
| > |
Update: July 25, 2008 |
| > |
Update: July 18, 2008 |
| > |
Update: June 28, 2008 |
| > |
Update: June 21, 2008 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
| Project Manager |
Steve Mason
Special Assistant to City Manager
City of Alexandria
703.838.3861
transloading@alexandriava.gov |
| Other Contacts |
Norfolk Southern
757.629.2713
contactus@nscorp.com |
Hon. John Warner
U.S. Senate
225 Russell Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
202.224.2023
E-mail |
Hon. James Webb
U.S. Senate
144 Russell Building
Washington, DC 20510
202.224.4024
E-mail |
Hon. James Moran
U.S. House of Representatives
2239 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515
202.225.4376
E-mail |
City Council
301 King Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.838.4550
E-mail |
|
 |
|
This page contains references and links to all electronic communications among City staff, and between City staff, Norfolk Southern, and the community regarding the establishment and operation of the Ethanol Transloading Facility. The communications, furnished in response to requests made under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, cover the period from June 20, 2006 at 8 a.m. to May 29, 2008, at 5 p.m.
E-mail addresses and telephone numbers have been redacted to protect the privacy of residents and of City staff whose home and mobile phone numbers were included on the communications. To contact City officials or staff, please use the links on the left side of this page, or Contact Us.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: hi
- To: "Ingrid Sanden" <xxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx>
- Subject: Re: hi
- From: Faroll Hamer/Alex
- Date: 18 May 2008 22:37:52
- Bcc:
- Cc:
Hi, Ingrid, I have seen the info about
the ethanol unloading -- the City tried to stop it, but there was a court
ruling ealier this year that completely took away our control -- the court
case wasn't a response to what's happening in Alexandria, it was a response
to something that happened in another state but it was at the federal level
and so applies to us. I will try to address it tomorrow night --
I know people are upset about it, but I don't think it will change anything
for the Landmark plan.
In a way it reinforces the idea that
the industrial uses around the metro station are not ready for redevelopment
--and may not be ripe until the redevelopment of the more northern parts
of Landmark and Van Dorn are well underway. I'm not so pessimistic
-- redevelopment happens by fits and starts, it's not a smooth sequential
process. I know the Cameron Station folk are impatient, and I don't blame
you. But I don't think the ethanol transloading will have
any impact on redevelopment at and around the mall, do you? Also,
I have an idea for bringing some environmental, water quality and stream
restoration issues into the plan that may be helpful in looking at the
industrial areas in a new light.
We're going to talk about affordable
housing tomorrow night --we don't have any recommendations, just information
at this point, but I will be very interested to hear the groups' comments.
See you tomorrow,
Faroll
PS -- ethanol -- can that possibly be
our energy future? I'm very skeptical.
| "Ingrid Sanden"
<xxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx>
05/18/2008 09:20 PM
|
|
To
| 
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| Re: hi |
|
Hi Faroll:
Sorry I didn't respond till now - busy week, and the next
few are just going to be awful. However, I did forward your note on to
a couple people (so good call on keeping it short and sweet), and there
will definitely be issues, as I'm sure you imagined. We're really feeling
put-upon right now here in Cameron Station, as there are some other issues
that have come to the surface (of course, during the busiest month of the
year for me), that are very serious for us, and for (I think) the whole
Landmark small area plan process.
Maybe you already know, but there is this new Norfolk
Southern ethanol unloading/transport spot right behind our houses on those
railroad tracks. There are seriously like 40 tankers lined up back there,
full of ethanol with pretty much no security that I can see. Seems like
it could be an issue, and at the very least, it's ugly as sin. So that's
my newest battle. I have no idea what is going on...
So anyway, I will see you tomorrow night. I'm just extremely
unhappy right now with various things. It seems like we're really gaining
momentum re: Landmark/Van Dorn, and now all these other hurdles are tossed
in our way (at the beginning of summer - and the timing is not lost on
me). Ugh. I just don't think I have any fight left in me for some of these
things...
If you need more info about the railroad stuff and haven't
seen it yourself, let me know and I can forward you what I have.
Ingrid
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:09 PM, <>
wrote:
Ingrid, I didn't mean to sound so abrupt in that last email -- I didnt
want to say anything personal so you could forward it more easily.
Thanks for all your input and interest in LandMark Van Dorn and also in
the SUP zoning process. It's great to have you on board. By
the way, Eric Wagner, the mayor and I met with Joanne Lepanto last week
to respond to her letter listing her concerns about the Landmark Plan.
I think it was productive, at least I hope it was. I really
enjoyed the charrette, and I think the next one with Alan Word will be
just as good, if not better. Also talked to Mindy about why Va Paving
is not in the plan. She said it was all about the fact that the clock
doesn't start ticking on the amortization until the property is rezoned
-- presumably through a small area plan -- and that she doesnt mind not
having it in the plan as long as we can find another way to start the clock.
I told her I would think about it, which I am doing. See you
Monday!
Faroll
--
Ingrid Sanden
xxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx
_______________________________________________
This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only and is not
for distribution or publication. If you have received this email in error,
please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not
the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute
this email without the author's prior permission. The information
contained in this communication may be confidential.
|
|